Quiet rooms at KUDO Hotel & Beach Club
Soundproofing is significantly compromised, with persistent noise complaints from street traffic, nightclub music, and pool activities penetrating rooms. One recent positive report suggests some rooms may be quieter, but the weight of evidence points to serious insulation deficiencies.
Strong negative trend concentrated in 2025–2026 reviews. The most recent claims (June–July 2026) from Saudi Arabian guests report severe nightclub noise and sleep loss. A single positive claim appears in July 2025. Earlier positive claim is from October 2025, suggesting no clear improvement over time; rather, problems appear persistent and consistently reported in recent months.
What the reviews tell us
Nightclub and pool bar music frequently penetrates rooms, with multiple reports of sleep disruption lasting until 4–8 am, particularly in beach-facing and pool-facing room locations
Street traffic noise is described as incessant and unrelenting through the night, making relaxation difficult
Corridor and interior spaces transmit noise from nightclub activity into adjacent guest rooms
Window glazing appears inadequate; one reviewer explicitly noted the need for triple glazing to achieve acceptable sound insulation
One recent guest reported that noise did not penetrate their room despite the busy location, suggesting room conditions or location may vary in their acoustic impact
The KUDO Hotel & Beach Club exhibits serious soundproofing deficiencies across multiple noise sources. Eight of nine claims report negative or mixed experiences, with the most recent reviews (June–July 2026) from Saudi Arabian guests documenting severe sleep disruption from nightclub music and street noise that lasted until 4–8 am. Pool-facing rooms are explicitly flagged as problematic due to music and activity noise, and beach-facing rooms experience similar issues until early morning hours. Street-side rooms expose guests to incessant traffic noise throughout the night. One reviewer recommended triple glazing as a necessary upgrade. However, a single July 2025 claim notes that one reviewer found noise did not penetrate their room despite the hotel's busy location, suggesting room location and condition may vary or that expectations differ. The contradiction is notable but outweighed by the volume and recency of negative specific complaints documenting actual sleep loss and inability to relax.
One Positive Outlier vs. Overwhelming Negative Evidence
Claim 274954 (July 2025) reports that noise does not penetrate into the room despite the busy location, contrasting sharply with eight other claims documenting pervasive noise problems from street traffic, nightclub music, and pool activities. This single positive claim may reflect: (1) a guest staying in an interior or back-facing room with better shielding; (2) lower expectations or tolerance for ambient noise; (3) a brief period when entertainment activities were minimal; or (4) variation in room condition or construction. The overwhelming weight and specificity of negative claims—including recent documentation of hours-long sleep disruption—suggests the positive claim represents an exception rather than the norm.
The evidence
Representative quotes from 9 supporting reviewsthe room's poor soundproofing did little to help the situation
The noise from the street was incessant, making it impossible to relax
the sound of the songs and music was so loud that I couldn't sleep until 8 am
there were noises in the corridors and rooms
Rooms were quiet but if wanting to face beach views, good luck with music & noise until 4am
Every finding cited to its source · How we decode →